Fiduciary Duty CASES

In English law, a fiduciary duty is a duty of loyalty and good faith owed by someone in a position of trust to another party. It requires the fiduciary to act solely in the beneficiary’s interests, avoiding conflicts and unauthorised gains.

Definition and Principles

Fiduciary duties arise in relationships of trust and confidence, such as trustee and beneficiary, company director and company, or solicitor and client. Equity imposes strict obligations to prevent abuse of power and protect vulnerable parties.

Requirements for Establishing

  • Relationship of trust: The fiduciary undertakes to act for or on behalf of another.
  • Duty of loyalty: The fiduciary must not place personal interests above the beneficiary’s.
  • No profit rule: Any unauthorised profit made in the course of the relationship belongs to the beneficiary.
  • No conflict rule: Fiduciaries must avoid conflicts between duty and personal interest.

Practical Applications

Classic cases include Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew (1998), defining fiduciary obligations, and Boardman v Phipps (1967), where a fiduciary had to account for profits gained despite acting in good faith.

Importance

Fiduciary duties safeguard integrity in relationships of trust, ensuring that those with power act in the best interests of others. They remain central to equity, company law, and professional regulation.

Law books in a law library

Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Aviss [2006] EWHC 1846 (Ch)

Directors' disqualification proceedings against two individuals who controlled three insolvent companies. They diverted company funds to other businesses in which one had interests, causing substantial creditor losses. Both were found unfit as directors for failing to respect corporate personality principles and were disqualified for seven and eleven years respectively. Facts...

Lady justice next to law books

Saatchi v Gajjar [2019] EWHC 3472 (Ch)

Charles Saatchi sought permission to continue a derivative claim on behalf of Triptych Logistics Limited against its sole director, Rahul Gajjar, alleging misappropriation of company assets including unauthorised loans, payroll payments, vehicle purchases, and credit card misuse. The court granted permission, finding sufficient merit in the claims. Facts Charles Saatchi...

Lady justice next to law books

Popely v Popely [2019] EWHC 1507 (Ch)

A double derivative action brought by John Snr's sons against their uncle Ronald, alleging he fraudulently transferred Casterbridge's assets to himself or his family's trust, depriving them of their 30% entitlement. The court dismissed all claims, finding no fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or de facto directorship established. Facts This...

Lady justice with law books

Noble Vintners Ltd, Re [2019] EWHC 2806 (Ch)

The first compensation order case under sections 15A and 15B of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986. Mr Eagling, sole director of Noble Vintners Ltd, misappropriated £559,484 to his own company. He was disqualified for 15 years and ordered to pay compensation to creditors who suffered direct losses from his...

Law books in a law library

Lexi Holdings plc v Ruqman [2009] EWCA Civ 117

Lexi Holdings, a bridging finance company, had £59.6 million misappropriated by its managing director Shaid Luqman. The Court of Appeal held that his sisters Monuza and Zaurian, as directors, were liable for losses caused by their total inactivity, as they failed to inform fellow directors of Shaid's criminal convictions and...

Lady justice next to law books

Kleanthous v Paphitis [2011] EWHC 2287 (Ch)

A minority shareholder sought permission to continue a derivative claim against directors for allegedly diverting a business opportunity (La Senza acquisition) to a company owned by the majority shareholder. Permission was refused as the court found the claim lacked sufficient merit, independent committees opposed it, and alternative unfair prejudice remedies...

Lady justice with law books

In Plus Group Ltd v Pyke [2002] EWCA Civ 370

Mr Pyke, a director excluded from company management after suffering a stroke, set up a competing business with his former company's main customer. The Court of Appeal held he did not breach fiduciary duty because his exclusion from all company affairs meant his directorship was nominal, eliminating any conflict of...

Law books on a desk

Iesini v Westrip Holdings Ltd [2009] EWHC 2526 (Ch)

Shareholders sought permission to continue a derivative claim against directors alleging breach of duty in accepting rescission of share sale agreements and failing to assert beneficial ownership of mining licences. The court refused permission for most claims but adjourned consideration of the trust claim, directing the board to reconsider its...

Law books on a desk

Keech v Sandford [1726] EWHC Ch J76

A trustee held a lease of market profits for an infant beneficiary. When the lessor refused to renew for the infant, the trustee obtained the lease himself. The court held he must assign it to the infant and account for profits, establishing the strict 'no profit' rule for fiduciaries. Facts...

Law books on a desk

Franbar Holdings Ltd v Patel [2008] EWHC 1534 (Ch)

Franbar Holdings Ltd, a 25% shareholder in Medicentres, sought permission to continue a derivative claim against directors Patel and du Plessis for alleged breaches of duty including diversion of business opportunities. The court refused permission, finding Franbar had adequate alternative remedies through its existing unfair prejudice petition and shareholders' action....

Law books in a law library

Fort Gilkicker Ltd, Re [2013] EWHC 348 (Ch)

UPMS, a member of an LLP which wholly owned Fort Gilkicker Ltd, sought permission to bring a double derivative action against a director who allegedly misappropriated a business opportunity. The court held that multiple derivative actions survived the Companies Act 2006 and granted permission to continue the claim. Facts Universal...

Law books in a law library

First Subsea Ltd v Balltec [2017] EWCA Civ 186

A company director prepared and submitted competitive bids for contracts through a rival company whilst still a director. The Court of Appeal held that his breaches of fiduciary duty were fraudulent within s.21(1)(a) Limitation Act 1980, meaning no limitation period applied. Directors are Class 1 fiduciaries and trustees for limitation...

Lady justice next to law books

CMS Dolphin Ltd v Simonet [2002] BCC 600

Mr Simonet, managing director of CMS Dolphin Ltd, resigned and diverted clients Argos, Reebok and DFB to his new venture with Mr Patterson. The court held he breached fiduciary duties by appropriating maturing business opportunities and was accountable for profits, even though profits were made through a corporate vehicle. Facts...

Law books on a desk

Burnell v Trans-Tag Ltd [2021] EWHC 1457 (Ch)

Mr Burnell invested £250,000 in Trans-Tag Ltd, expecting shares in return under an agreement with Mr Aird. When shares were not issued, he sought repayment. The company counterclaimed for breach of directors' duties after Mr Burnell acquired the company's licensor. The court allowed partial recovery for both parties. Facts Trans-Tag...

Law books on a desk

BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112

BTI claimed directors of AWA breached their duty to creditors by paying a dividend to parent company Sequana, reducing assets available to meet contingent indemnity liabilities. The Court of Appeal upheld the section 423 claim against Sequana for defrauding creditors but dismissed the breach of duty claim, finding the creditors'...

Law books on a desk

Bilta (UK) Ltd v Nazir [2015] UKSC 23

Bilta’s liquidators sued its former directors and their co-conspirators for losses caused by a VAT carousel fraud. The directors had breached their fiduciary duties by causing Bilta to participate in fraudulent transactions. The Supreme Court held that the illegality defence was not available to the defendants because attributing the directors’...

Lady justice with law books

Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] EWCA Civ 424

Directors of a family company purchased property adjacent to company premises for their personal benefit without disclosing the opportunity to their co-directors. The Court of Appeal held they breached their fiduciary duty as there was a real sensible possibility of conflict between their personal interests and their duty to the...