Analysis

The case explores the boundary between political expression and religious manifestation, and how consistently applied workplace-neutrality policies can defeat discrimination and harassment claims.

The UK Supreme Court in Atkins v HMRC and HMRC v HFFX LLP on s.850 and s.687 ITTOIA: deferred partnership remuneration, the source test and Ramsay limits.

The Supreme Court has confirmed that unfair prejudice petitions under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 are not subject to a statutory limitation period. This analysis examines the Court’s reasoning, the continuing relevance of delay and the wider implications for statutory and insolvency claims.

Analysis of Dillon [2026] UKSC 15 in which the Supreme Court narrows Art 2(1) of the Windsor Framework, confines the Charter & reshapes the Legacy Act.

This review examines why X and Y is a landmark, what it changes in practice, and where its ripples may be felt - including in surrogacy, public law work, and the constitutional law of the prerogative.

How CILEX v Mazur [2026] rescued paralegals, law centres & PI firms from accidental criminality & what it says about who practises law.

Capital allowances for preparatory survey costs denied: "on the provision of plant" requires a close connection to the plant itself.

Job offers can be withdrawn, but employers risk breach of contract or discrimination claims if conditions are misused or bias drives the decision.

The Supreme Court clarifies s.39 FSMA: principals can limit AR responsibility by client category.

The Supreme Court sanctions block letter of credit payments linked to pre-existing Russian aircraft leases. S.44 SAMLA protects compliant banks.

The Supreme Court’s decision in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals is one of the most important recent judgments on quantum, not only in clinical negligence, but across serious injury litigation more generally.

At first glance, THG Plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd looks like a technical limitations appeal. In reality, it is a major statement about the nature of the unfair prejudice jurisdiction itself. By a 4 – 1 majority, the Supreme Court held on 25 February…

Why a modest compensation-order dispute has become an important authority on finality, correction and the true reach of the magistrates’ post-sentence powers.

In fields as diverse as public law, immigration, environmental planning, consumer finance, and intellectual property, this year’s decisions underline the importance of remaining current with developments that have profound practical implications.

In Evans v NatWest Markets Plc the UK Supreme Court allowed the banks’ appeal and reinstated the specialist tribunal’s refusal to certify Phillip Gywn James Evans’ application for opt-out collective proceedings in a follow-on foreign exchange (FX) damages claim, emphasising the breadth of the Tribunal’s discretionary…

In Emotional Perception AI Limited v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (UKSC/2024/0131) the Supreme Court has reset the UK’s approach to the “computer program … as such” exclusion, overruling the long‑used Aerotel methodology and aligning UK interpretation with the European Patent Office’s reading…

In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB [2026] UKSC 4, the Supreme Court held that Oatly’s trade mark “POST MILK GENERATION” is invalid so far as it covers oat-based foods and drinks, because section 3(4) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 blocks registration where the mark’s…

The Supreme Court’s judgment in Jwanczuk affirms judicial restraint, upholding bright-line rules even amid proven disability-related discrimination. It also clarifies precedent for devolved contexts, limiting strict "follow unless compelling reason" principles to tax cases.