Psychiatric Injury CASES

In English law, psychiatric injury (nervous shock) refers to a medically recognised psychiatric condition caused by a defendant’s tort. Mere grief, distress, or anxiety is not enough without a recognised disorder (for example, PTSD, major depressive disorder, or an adjustment disorder).

Definition and principles

Claims divide into primary victims and secondary victims. Primary victims are directly involved in the incident or within the range of foreseeable physical injury; ordinary negligence principles apply. Secondary victims are witnesses to injury to others and must satisfy control mechanisms: (i) a close tie of love and affection; (ii) proximity in time and space to the accident or its immediate aftermath; (iii) direct perception by sight or hearing (not via third-hand reports). Modern authority also emphasises the need for an identifiable accident or external event rather than a gradual realisation.

Common examples

  • Employee suffers PTSD after being involved in an explosion at work (primary victim).
  • Parent witnesses a child’s serious injury in a road traffic accident and develops a recognised disorder (secondary victim).
  • Rescuer directly exposed to danger at a disaster scene (often treated as primary depending on facts).
  • Claims failing where distress stems from news of injury, negligent information, or a prolonged deterioration without a single event.

Legal implications

  • Diagnosis must be a recognised psychiatric condition; expert medical evidence is standard.
  • For secondary victims, all control mechanisms must be met; bystanders with no close tie usually fail.
  • Causation and remoteness apply; the “egg-shell skull” rule means vulnerability does not defeat liability once duty and breach are established.
  • Limitation is generally three years from injury or date of knowledge (with court discretion to extend).

Practical importance

Plead whether the claimant is primary or secondary, set out the accident/event, the control mechanisms (if secondary), and provide early psychiatric evidence to confirm diagnosis and causation.

See also: Negligence; Duty of care; Secondary victims; Proximity; Rescuers; Pure psychiatric harm; Personal injury; Limitation.

Law books in a law library

R v Burstow; R v Ireland [1997] UKHL 34

Two appeals concerning whether psychiatric injury can constitute bodily harm under the Offences against the Person Act 1861. Ireland made silent telephone calls causing psychiatric illness; Burstow stalked a woman causing severe depression. The House of Lords held psychiatric injury is bodily harm and can be inflicted without physical violence....

Lady justice with law books

R v D (Dhaliwal) [2006] EWCA Crim 1139

D was accused of manslaughter and inflicting grievous bodily harm after his wife, allegedly subjected to long-term domestic abuse, committed suicide. The Court of Appeal held that psychological injury without a recognisable psychiatric illness does not constitute “bodily harm” under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, upholding the terminating...

Law books in a law library

W v Essex CC [2000] UKHL 17

Approved foster parents told the local authority they would not accept a child known or suspected to be a sexual abuser. The authority nevertheless placed such a boy, who abused their children. The House of Lords held the parents’ psychiatric injury claim was arguable and should not be struck out....

Law books in a law library

Taylor v A Novo (UK) [2013] EWCA Civ 194

Mrs Taylor was injured at work through her employer’s admitted negligence and died three weeks later from complications. Her daughter developed PTSD after witnessing the death and claimed as a secondary victim. The Court of Appeal held she could not recover, restricting proximity for psychiatric injury claims. Facts On 27...

Lady justice next to law books

Reilly v Merseyside HA [1994] EWCA Civ 30

Mr and Mrs Reilly were trapped in an overcrowded hospital lift for over an hour and claimed for psychological harm. The Court of Appeal held that mere fear, claustrophobia and transient physical symptoms without a recognisable psychiatric illness or physical injury are not actionable in negligence. Facts Mr and Mrs...

Lady justice next to law books

Palmer v Tees HA [1999] EWCA Civ 1533

A psychiatric patient, Armstrong, murdered four‑year‑old Rosie Palmer. Her mother sued health authorities, alleging negligent diagnosis, treatment and failure to detain him, and claiming for her own psychiatric injury. The Court of Appeal held there was no duty of care to unidentifiable victims and her secondary victim claim failed. Appeal...

Law books in a law library

Page v Smith [1995] UKHL 7

Mr Page, with a pre-existing chronic fatigue condition, was involved in a car collision caused by Mr Smith but suffered no physical injury. He later developed permanent relapse of his condition. The House of Lords held that as a primary victim he only needed to show foreseeable personal injury, not...

Lady justice next to law books

McLoughlin v O’Brian [1982] UKHL 3

Mrs McLoughlin suffered severe psychiatric illness after arriving at hospital to find her family seriously injured and her daughter dead following a road accident caused by the defendants' negligence. The House of Lords held she could recover damages for nervous shock despite not witnessing the accident itself, establishing that liability...

Law books on a desk

Sutherland v Hatton [2002] EWCA Civ 76 (05 February 2002)

Four employees claimed damages for psychiatric illness caused by workplace stress. The Court of Appeal established practical principles for employer liability in occupational stress cases, allowing three appeals and dismissing one. The court held that foreseeability of psychiatric harm to the specific employee is the threshold question. Facts Four appeals...