Criminal barristers challenged the Legal Services Board's approval of the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA), which required judicial assessment of advocates. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that even if the scheme was an authorisation scheme under EU law, it was proportionate and justified. Facts The Legal Services...
Four Afghan unaccompanied minors challenged the rejection of their asylum claims, arguing that section 83 NIAA breached the right to an effective remedy and that the Home Secretary's failure to trace their families vitiated the decisions. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals. Facts The four appellants (TN, MA and AA)...
Mr Gabriel's solicitors were found negligent over a £200,000 loan transaction, but the Court of Appeal reduced damages to nominal £2 and ordered costs against him. After his bankruptcy, his trustee sought a ruling on personal costs liability if adopting the pending Supreme Court appeal. Facts Mr Richard Gabriel lent...
Aspect carried out an asbestos survey for Higgins. An adjudicator ordered Aspect to pay Higgins £658,017. After limitation expired on Higgins's underlying claim, Aspect sued to recover the payment. The Supreme Court held an implied term or restitutionary right allowed recovery within six years of payment. Facts Aspect Contracts (Asbestos)...
The Pendragon Group used a KPMG-designed VAT scheme involving demonstrator cars, exploiting exemptions to recover input tax while paying output tax only on profit margins. The Supreme Court held the scheme was an abuse of law and allowed HMRC's appeal. Facts The Pendragon Group, Europe’s largest car sales group, implemented...
A French father sought the return of his two young daughters from Scotland under the Hague Convention, arguing they remained habitually resident in France. The Supreme Court dismissed his appeal, holding the children had become habitually resident in Scotland after four months of stable residence. Facts The two children, born...
A pregnant woman surrendered her hostel tenancy due to smells, then gave birth months later. Waltham Forest found her intentionally homeless. The Supreme Court held that her baby's birth, which would have caused homelessness regardless, broke the causal chain. Facts The appellant, Ms Haile, surrendered her tenancy of a bedsitting...
Hong Kong-based PCCM operated a NOW TV service and sought to prevent Sky from launching a UK service under the same name. The Supreme Court held that passing off requires actual goodwill, in the form of customers, within the UK jurisdiction—mere reputation is insufficient. Facts The appellants, Starbucks (HK) Ltd...
Three homeless applicants challenged local authorities' decisions that they were not 'vulnerable' under section 189(1)(c) of the Housing Act 1996. The Supreme Court clarified the correct comparator, the relevance of third-party support, and the public sector equality duty's application. Facts Three conjoined appeals concerned the assessment of ‘vulnerability’ under section...
Mr Gaughran was convicted of drink driving in Northern Ireland. The PSNI retained his DNA profile, fingerprints and photograph indefinitely. He challenged this under article 8 ECHR. The Supreme Court held, by majority, that indefinite retention was proportionate and lawful. Facts On 14 October 2008, the appellant, Fergus Gaughran, was...
ClientEarth challenged the UK Government's continuing failure since 2010 to meet EU nitrogen dioxide limits under Directive 2008/50/EC. Following a CJEU reference, the Supreme Court granted a mandatory order requiring new air quality plans by 31 December 2015. Facts The United Kingdom had admitted continuing failure since 2010 to comply,...
Individual members of forex trading LLP HFFX used a Capital Allocation Plan to defer remuneration via a corporate partner, GSAM, taxed at lower corporation tax rates. The Supreme Court held the deferred sums were taxable as income under section 687 ITTOIA, but section 850 did not apply. Facts HFFX LLP...
Trustees of Olympic Airlines' UK pension scheme sought a winding-up order in England to qualify for the Pension Protection Fund. The Supreme Court held that Olympic had no 'establishment' in the UK under EU Regulation 1346/2000, as only internal wind-down activities were occurring at its London office. Facts Olympic Airlines...
The University of Stirling failed to consult trade unions about non-renewal of limited term contracts during a redundancy process. The Supreme Court held that non-renewal of such contracts for reasons relating to the employer's business needs constitutes dismissal as redundant, requiring collective consultation. Facts In 2009-2010, the University of Stirling...
Westminster charged sex shop licence applicants a two-part fee, including a refundable element covering enforcement costs against unlicensed operators. The Supreme Court held domestic law permitted this and that EU law allowed type A schemes, but referred the type B refundable scheme to the CJEU. Facts Westminster City Council was...
A fraudster used fake insurance websites to dupe victims into paying money into bank accounts opened by the respondent. The Supreme Court held that money obtained by fraud became criminal property on receipt, so a section 328 POCA arrangement to retain it was chargeable. Facts The respondent, GH, opened two...
A homeless single mother of five with serious health conditions was offered temporary accommodation in Bletchley by Westminster City Council, far from her London home. The Supreme Court allowed her appeal, holding the council had failed to evidence and justify the out-of-borough placement under the Housing Act 1996. Facts The...
Journalist Rob Evans sought disclosure of correspondence between Prince Charles and government ministers. The Upper Tribunal ordered disclosure, but the Attorney General issued a section 53 certificate overriding the decision. The Supreme Court held the certificate unlawful, upholding judicial supremacy over executive override. Facts Rob Evans, a Guardian journalist, requested...
The Supreme Court considered whether a local authority should pay a father's costs after his successful appeal against care and placement orders. It held that the general 'no costs' rule in children's cases applies equally to appeals, absent reprehensible or unreasonable conduct. Facts The case concerned Amelia, aged seven, one...
Dorset County Council rejected five applications to record byways on its definitive map because the accompanying maps were computer-enlarged from 1:50,000 OS originals. The Supreme Court held, by majority, that maps presented at 1:25,000 satisfied the statutory requirement, preserving the vehicular rights of way. Facts Five applications were made under...
Mr Braganza, BP's Chief Engineer, disappeared at sea. BP concluded he had committed suicide, denying his widow death-in-service benefits. The Supreme Court held that BP's contractual discretion required a rational decision-making process, and the evidence was insufficient to overcome the inherent improbability of suicide. Facts Mr Renford Braganza, Chief Engineer...
Lone mothers challenged the benefit cap introduced under the Welfare Reform Act 2012, arguing it indirectly discriminated against women and victims of domestic violence, contrary to Article 14 ECHR read with A1P1. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by majority, holding the cap was justified. Facts The Secretary of State...
A disabled tenant resisted possession proceedings brought by a social landlord, raising a disability discrimination defence under the Equality Act 2010. The Supreme Court held that such defences require a different, more rigorous approach than Article 8 defences, but dismissed his appeal on the facts. Facts The appellant, a 47-year-old...
Kathleen Wyatt sought financial provision from her ex-husband Dale Vince, now a wealthy green energy entrepreneur, 19 years after their divorce following a brief, impoverished marriage. The Supreme Court reinstated her application, holding it should not have been struck out under Rule 4.4. Facts The parties married in December 1981...
A property developer secured oral assurances from his bank to fund both the purchase and development of a Gleneagles plot subject to a buy-back clause. The bank later refused development funding. The Supreme Court restored the Lord Ordinary's finding that a binding promise existed. Facts Mr Carlyle, a property developer,...