Case summaries

Lady justice next to law books

Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984] UKHL 9

Civil servants at GCHQ were banned from joining national trade unions without prior consultation, citing national security. The unions claimed legitimate expectation of consultation. The House of Lords held that while prerogative powers are subject to judicial review, national security concerns justified the government's failure to consult. Facts Government Communications...

Law books in a law library

Canaj v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Vallaj v Special Adjudicator [2001] EWCA Civ 782

Two Kosovar Albanian asylum seekers challenged decisions refusing them refugee status. The Court considered whether protection provided by UNMIK and KFOR in Kosovo satisfied Convention requirements, and whether the 'internal flight alternative' applied. Both applications were refused, confirming that international protection in Kosovo was sufficient and internal relocation principles only...

Lady justice with law books

Bernard v France – 22885/93 [1998] ECHR 31

Mr Bernard challenged psychiatric experts' statements at his assize court trial for armed robbery, claiming they violated his presumption of innocence by expressing opinions on his guilt. The European Court of Human Rights found no violation, holding the statements formed only part of evidence and the trial as a whole...

Law books in a law library

Belgian Linguistics Case (No 2) [1967] ECHR 1

French-speaking Belgian parents challenged language education laws requiring Dutch-language instruction in Flemish regions. Belgium raised a preliminary objection to the Court’s jurisdiction. The Court unanimously rejected this objection, establishing that disputes concerning interpretation and application of the Convention fall within its jurisdiction. Facts Six applications were brought by French-speaking Belgian...

Lady justice with law books

Amuur v France (Application 19776/92) [1996] ECHR 25

Four Somali asylum-seekers were held in the transit zone of Paris-Orly Airport for twenty days without adequate legal basis or judicial review before being returned to Syria. The European Court of Human Rights found France violated Article 5(1), establishing that holding asylum-seekers in transit zones constitutes deprivation of liberty requiring...