Case summaries

Lady justice with law books

PACCAR Inc & Ors, R (on the application of) v Competition Appeal Tribunal & Ors [2023] UKSC 28

Truck manufacturers challenged collective proceedings brought by purchasers claiming compensation for price-fixing. The Supreme Court held that litigation funding agreements where funders receive a percentage of damages recovered are damages-based agreements under section 58AA CLSA 1990, rendering them unenforceable without compliance with statutory requirements. Facts Following a European Commission decision...

Law books in a law library

W80, R (on the application of Officer) v Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct & Ors [2023] UKSC 24

A police officer (W80) shot and killed Jermaine Baker during an operation based on intelligence that suspects were armed. The IOPC directed disciplinary proceedings applying the civil law test for self-defence. The Supreme Court held that the civil law test applies in police disciplinary proceedings, not the criminal law test,...

Law books on a desk

Marouf, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 23

A Palestinian refugee in Lebanon challenged the UK's Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme, arguing the public sector equality duty (PSED) under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 applied extraterritorially. The Supreme Court held the PSED does not have extraterritorial effect, dismissing the appeal. Facts The Appellant, a Palestinian refugee from...

Law books in a law library

VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 10

VIP Communications challenged a direction by the Secretary of State under section 5 of the Communications Act 2003, which instructed Ofcom not to exempt commercial multi-user GSM gateways from licensing requirements. The Supreme Court held the Secretary of State had power to give such directions on national security grounds, reversing...

Lady justice next to law books

Rakusen v Jepsen & Ors [2023] UKSC 9

Tenants in an unlicensed HMO sought a Rent Repayment Order against the superior landlord rather than their immediate landlord. The Supreme Court held that RROs under the Housing and Planning Act 2016 can only be made against the immediate landlord under the tenancy generating the relevant rent, not superior landlords....