Case summaries

Law books on a desk

R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 10

VIP Communications challenged a direction by the Secretary of State under section 5 of the Communications Act 2003, which instructed Ofcom not to exempt commercial multi-user GSM gateways from licensing requirements. The Supreme Court held the Secretary of State had power to give such directions on national security grounds, reversing...

Lady justice next to law books

Rakusen v Jepsen & Ors [2023] UKSC 9

Tenants in an unlicensed HMO sought a Rent Repayment Order against the superior landlord rather than their immediate landlord. The Supreme Court held that RROs under the Housing and Planning Act 2016 can only be made against the immediate landlord under the tenancy generating the relevant rent, not superior landlords....

Law books on a desk

UniCredit Bank GmbH, London Branch v Constitution Aircraft Leasing (Ireland) 3 Ltd and another [2026] UKSC 10

UniCredit Bank refused to pay under letters of credit issued for aircraft leases to Russian airlines, citing UK sanctions. The Supreme Court held that regulation 28(3)(c) prohibited payment until licences were obtained, as payments were 'in connection with' arrangements making aircraft available to Russia. Section 44 SAMLA provides protection for...

Lady justice next to law books

Aviva Investors Ground Rent GP Ltd and another v Williams and others [2023] UKSC 6

Residential tenants challenged their landlord's contractual power to re-apportion service charges, arguing section 27A(6) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 rendered such provisions void. The Supreme Court held that section 27A(6) only protects the tribunal's jurisdiction to review decisions for contractual and statutory legitimacy, not to replace landlords' discretionary...

Law books in a law library

Smith v Leech Brain & Co Ltd [1962] 2 QB 405

A galvaniser suffered a burn on his lip from molten zinc due to his employer's negligence. The burn triggered cancer in pre-disposed tissue, causing his death three years later. The court held the employer liable for the full consequences, establishing the eggshell skull rule in negligence. Facts The defendant company...

Law books on a desk

Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963] AC 837

An 8-year-old boy was severely burned when a paraffin lamp fell into a manhole left unattended by Post Office workers, causing an explosion. The House of Lords held that liability arises where the type of harm is foreseeable, even if the precise manner of occurrence was not. Facts In November...

Lady justice with law books

Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1978] AC 728

Lessees of maisonettes sued the local council after structural defects emerged due to inadequate foundations. The House of Lords established a two-stage test for determining duty of care in negligence: first examining proximity and foreseeability, then considering policy reasons against imposing such duty. Facts In 1962, Merton London Borough Council...

Lady justice next to law books

Heaven v Pender (1883) 11 QBD 503

A ship painter was injured when staging ropes provided by a dry dock owner failed. The Court of Appeal, through Brett MR's influential obiter, articulated an early general principle of duty of care in negligence, foreshadowing the modern law established in Donoghue v Stevenson. Facts The defendant was the owner...

Lady justice with law books

McCue v Glasgow City Council [2023] UKSC 1

Mrs McCue, guardian for her disabled son Andrew, challenged Glasgow City Council's charges for community care services, arguing insufficient deductions for disability-related expenditure. The Supreme Court held the Council's charging policy did not constitute unlawful discrimination under sections 15 or 20 of the Equality Act 2010. Facts Andrew McCue, a...

Law books in a law library

The Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21

Mrs Brazel, a part-year visiting music teacher, claimed her employer underpaid her holiday pay by using a percentage method rather than the statutory formula. The Supreme Court held that part-year workers are entitled to 5.6 weeks paid leave without pro-rating for weeks not worked, rejecting the employer's alternative calculation methods....