Promissory estoppel CASES

In English law, promissory estoppel prevents a party from going back on a promise, even without formal consideration, if the other party has reasonably relied on that promise to their detriment.

Definition and Principles

Promissory estoppel arises when one party clearly promises to waive or suspend certain legal rights, and the other party relies on this promise, altering their position as a result. The doctrine ensures fairness by preventing unjust or inequitable outcomes.

Key Conditions

  • Clear Promise: A definite and unambiguous promise or representation.
  • Reliance: The other party must have acted in reliance upon that promise.
  • Inequity: It must be unfair or unjust for the promisor to break the promise.

Limitations

Promissory estoppel is typically a defensive remedy, preventing enforcement of certain rights rather than creating new obligations. It usually suspends rights temporarily rather than extinguishing them permanently.

Practical Importance

Promissory estoppel reinforces equitable fairness in commercial dealings, encouraging honesty and preventing unfair exploitation of informal agreements.

You may find our detailed guide on estoppel helpful.

Lady justice with law books

Tool Metal Manufacturing Company Ltd v Tungsten Electric Company Ltd [1955] UKHL 5 (16 June 1955)

T.M.M.C. granted TECO a patent licence requiring royalty and 'compensation' payments for exceeding production quotas. During wartime, T.M.M.C. informally suspended compensation claims. The House of Lords held that delivery of a counterclaim in earlier litigation sufficiently terminated this equitable suspension, allowing T.M.M.C. to recover compensation after reasonable notice. Facts Tool...