Promissory estoppel CASES
In English law, promissory estoppel prevents a party from going back on a promise, even without formal consideration, if the other party has reasonably relied on that promise to their detriment.
Definition and Principles
Promissory estoppel arises when one party clearly promises to waive or suspend certain legal rights, and the other party relies on this promise, altering their position as a result. The doctrine ensures fairness by preventing unjust or inequitable outcomes.
Key Conditions
- Clear Promise: A definite and unambiguous promise or representation.
- Reliance: The other party must have acted in reliance upon that promise.
- Inequity: It must be unfair or unjust for the promisor to break the promise.
Limitations
Promissory estoppel is typically a defensive remedy, preventing enforcement of certain rights rather than creating new obligations. It usually suspends rights temporarily rather than extinguishing them permanently.
Practical Importance
Promissory estoppel reinforces equitable fairness in commercial dealings, encouraging honesty and preventing unfair exploitation of informal agreements.
You may find our detailed guide on estoppel helpful.
Home » Promissory estoppel
Marks & Spencer abruptly terminated a 30-year supply relationship with Baird Textiles without notice. Baird claimed an implied contract and estoppel required reasonable notice. The Court of Appeal held neither claim had real prospects of success, affirming contractual certainty requirements and that estoppel cannot create a cause of action outside...
Mr Collier, jointly liable with two partners on a judgment debt, claimed a creditor had agreed to accept only his one-third share. The Court of Appeal held no binding contract existed but set aside the statutory demand, finding a triable promissory estoppel issue. Facts Mr Collier was in partnership with...
During World War II, a landlord agreed to reduce rent on flats that became difficult to let. After the war ended, the landlord sought to recover full rent. The court held that the promise to accept reduced rent was binding during the war period, establishing the doctrine of promissory estoppel...
Kenyan coffee sellers contracted with Tanzanian buyers for payment in Kenyan shillings. A letter of credit was issued in sterling, which the sellers accepted and used for payment. After sterling devaluation, sellers claimed the difference. The Court held that by accepting the sterling credit, sellers had waived their right to...
T.M.M.C. granted TECO a patent licence requiring royalty and 'compensation' payments for exceeding production quotas. During wartime, T.M.M.C. informally suspended compensation claims. The House of Lords held that delivery of a counterclaim in earlier litigation sufficiently terminated this equitable suspension, allowing T.M.M.C. to recover compensation after reasonable notice. Facts Tool...
Selectmove Ltd owed substantial PAYE and NIC arrears to the Inland Revenue. The company's director claimed an agreement was made with a tax collector to pay arrears by instalments. The Court of Appeal held there was no binding agreement due to lack of authority and consideration, reaffirming that practical benefits...
Miss Marnell repeatedly declared she had abandoned a £1200 bond debt owed by William Money, and his marriage proceeded on this faith. After her own marriage, she sought to enforce the bond. The House of Lords held that a representation of intention is not the same as a misrepresentation of...
A landlord served a six-month notice to repair on his tenant railway company. During negotiations for the sale of the lease, repairs were suspended by mutual understanding. The House of Lords held the landlord could not enforce forfeiture when repairs were completed within six months of negotiations ending, establishing the...
D & C Builders, a small building company in financial difficulties, were owed £482 by Rees. His wife offered £300 in full settlement, threatening they would receive nothing otherwise. The Court of Appeal held the payment did not discharge the debt as there was no consideration and the agreement was...
Wife left matrimonial home with husband's consent for a holiday but did not return. Husband petitioned for divorce claiming wife's desertion revived her previously condoned adultery. Court found husband failed to prove wife intended to desert, as he kept her short of money and showed no genuine desire for her...