Sex discrimination CASES

In Great Britain (England, Wales and Scotland), sex discrimination is primarily governed by the Equality Act 2010. Northern Ireland operates a separate, though broadly comparable, statutory framework.

Definition and scope

Sex discrimination arises where a person is treated less favourably, or placed at a particular disadvantage, because of sex. Protection applies across employment, education, the provision of services, and the exercise of public functions.

Key principles

Formal equality: Comparable treatment must not differ on the basis of sex.

Substantive equality: Apparently neutral provisions or practices may be unlawful where they disproportionately disadvantage one sex.

Justification: Indirect discrimination may be lawful only where it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Forms of sex discrimination

Direct discrimination: Less favourable treatment because of sex.

Indirect discrimination: A provision, criterion or practice that puts one sex at a particular disadvantage.

Harassment: Unwanted conduct related to sex that violates dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading or offensive environment.

Victimisation: Detriment suffered as a result of doing a protected act.

Limitations

Limited statutory exceptions apply, including genuine occupational requirements, but these are construed narrowly and subject to strict scrutiny.

Practical importance

Sex discrimination law underpins equal treatment in work and public life, shaping recruitment, pay, service provision and the exercise of public power throughout Great Britain.

Defrenne v SABENA (No2) [1976] EUECJ C-43/75 (equal pay)

An air hostess claimed compensation for pay discrimination compared to male cabin stewards doing identical work. The Court held that Article 119 EEC Treaty on equal pay has direct effect and can be relied upon before national courts, establishing the principle of equal pay as a foundation of Community law.

For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16 (16 April 2025)

For Women Scotland challenged Scottish Government guidance on the Gender Representation on Public Boards Act 2018. The Supreme Court held that 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 means biological sex only, not certificated sex obtained through a Gender Recognition Certificate. Trans women with GRCs are therefore not 'women' for EA 2010 purposes.

Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire AHA (No.1) (C152/84)

Miss Marshall was dismissed at age 62 solely because she had reached the state pension age for women, which differed from that for men. The ECJ held this constituted sex discrimination under Directive 76/207, and that directives could be directly invoked against state authorities acting as employers.

Pickstone v Freemans Plc [1988] UKHL 2

Female warehouse operatives claimed equal pay with a male checker warehouse operative whose work was of equal value to theirs. The employer argued the claim was barred because a man did the same work as the women. The House of Lords held that section 1(2)(c) of the Equal Pay Act 1970 must be construed purposively to comply with European Community law obligations.

Von Colson & Anor v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen [1984] EUECJ R-14/83

Two female social workers were refused employment at a male prison due to their sex, with less qualified male candidates appointed instead. The Court established that national courts must interpret domestic law in light of EU directives to achieve their objectives, and that compensation for discrimination must be adequate and have deterrent effect.