Proprietary Interest CASES

In English law, a proprietary interest is a right in or over property (land, goods, or certain intangibles) that binds third parties. It is different from a mere personal right under a contract, which binds only the parties. Proprietary interests can be legal (for example, a freehold estate or legal mortgage) or equitable (for example, a beneficiary’s interest under a trust or an equitable charge).

Definition and principles

A proprietary interest is a right in rem that attaches to an asset, follows it (and traceable substitutes in equity), and takes priority over the owner’s unsecured creditors. English law recognises a limited set of property rights (sometimes described as a “numerus clausus”): parties cannot create new kinds of property rights at will. Formalities and registration often matter: some interests only arise or take effect against third parties if statutory steps are satisfied.

Why it matters (typical contexts)

  • Standing in torts concerning land and goods: a claimant in private nuisance generally needs a proprietary interest (owner or tenant with exclusive possession). Trespass to land turns on possession; trespass to goods and conversion require possession or an immediate right to possess.
  • Trusts and equitable claims: a beneficiary holds an equitable proprietary interest in trust assets. That proprietary base enables remedies like tracing into substitutes and claims such as knowing receipt (where trust property is received).
  • Security and priorities: mortgages, fixed and floating charges, liens and pledges are proprietary security interests. On insolvency, proprietary claimants stand ahead of unsecured creditors because the asset is not part of the general estate.
  • Proprietary vs personal remedies: proprietary injunctions and constructive trusts respond to interference with specific property; a purely personal damages award does not give priority or follow the asset.
  • Licences and occupancy: a bare or contractual licence gives permission but ordinarily no proprietary interest. It binds the licensor but not third parties unless statute or equity intervenes.

Common examples

  • Land: freehold and leasehold estates; easements and restrictive covenants; equitable interests under a trust of land. Registration determines what binds purchasers.
  • Goods (chattels): title under a sale, a pledge, or a lien created by law; a bailee’s possessory rights supporting actions in conversion or trespass to goods.
  • Intangibles: legal assignment of a debt; equitable assignment where formalities for a legal assignment are not met; beneficial ownership of company shares held on trust by a nominee.
  • Commercial devices: retention-of-title clauses (creating or preserving a proprietary interest in supplied goods) and fixed charges over receivables or equipment.

Legal implications

  • Formalities and registration: many proprietary interests require writing, execution or registration to bind third parties. Failure may leave only a personal right.
  • Notice and bona fide purchasers: some equitable interests are defeated by a good-faith purchaser of a legal estate for value without notice. Land registration and company charges regimes modify how priority and notice work.
  • Tracing and following: equitable proprietary interests can be traced into substitutes (subject to defences). This matters where property is misapplied or mixed.
  • Remedies and priority: having a proprietary interest can unlock proprietary injunctions, specific delivery, constructive trusts, and priority on insolvency; without it, remedies are typically personal claims in damages.

Practical importance

When advising, identify precisely what the client owns (legal or equitable), how the interest arose (formalities, registration, trust), and against whom it is enforceable. In disputes, establish whether the claimant has a proprietary interest (to sue in trespass, nuisance or conversion), or only personal rights. In transactions, choose the right security, comply with formalities, and check the register and priority rules to avoid being postponed to earlier interests.

See also: Possession; Trusts and equitable interests; Trespass (land and goods); Private nuisance; Conversion; Security interests (mortgage, charge, lien); Registration and priority; Tracing; Bona fide purchaser.

Lady justice with law books

Malone v Laskey (1907) 2 KB 141 (25 March 1907)

The wife of an employee was injured by a falling cistern, caused by vibrations from a neighbouring engine. Her claim failed as she had no proprietary or contractual right to the property, only a licence to be there, defeating claims in both nuisance and negligence. Facts The claimant, Mrs Malone, resided in a house with her husband. The house was rented not by them, but by her husband’s employer, a company. Mr Malone was the company’s manager and occupied the house as part of his employment arrangement. The landlords had fixed a water cistern to the wall of the lavatory,

Lady justice with law books

Khoransandjian v Bush [1993] EWCA Civ 18

A young woman received persistent, unwanted telephone calls from a former friend. She successfully obtained an injunction to stop the harassment, even though she had no proprietary interest in the property. The case extended the tort of private nuisance to protect individuals. Facts The plaintiff, Miss Natasha Khorasandjian, an 18-year-old woman, was subjected to a campaign of harassment by the defendant, Mr Martin Bush, a 29-year-old man. They had been friends, but after their friendship ended, the defendant developed an obsession with the plaintiff. The harassment included threats of violence, unwanted visits, and persistent, menacing telephone calls to her parents’

Law books in a law library

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] UKHL 14

Residents claimed against Canary Wharf Ltd in nuisance for dust from construction and interference with television signals caused by a new tower. The House of Lords held that TV interference was not an actionable nuisance and, crucially, only claimants with a proprietary interest in the affected land could sue. Facts This case consolidated two sets of actions brought by hundreds of local residents. The first group of claimants, living in the shadow of the Canary Wharf Tower in London Docklands, complained that the construction of the tower, which was completed in 1990, interfered with their television reception. The tower, a