Failure of Consideration CASES
In English contract law, failure of consideration occurs when one party does not deliver the promised consideration, or when the consideration provided is substantially different or insufficient from what was agreed, undermining the basis of the contract.
Definition and Principles
Failure of consideration arises when a party receives nothing, or substantially less than expected, after having performed their side of the bargain. Unlike “lack of consideration,” a failure of consideration typically emerges after contract formation and performance has begun.
Common Examples
- Payment made but goods never delivered.
- Goods or services provided are fundamentally different from those agreed upon.
- Advance payments made for events subsequently cancelled or frustrated.
Legal Implications
Practical Importance
Recognising failure of consideration clarifies parties’ rights to remedies and recovery, ensuring fairness when contractual promises aren’t honoured or delivered.
Home » Failure of Consideration
A Polish company paid an advance for machinery from an English company. The contract was frustrated by the outbreak of WWII. The House of Lords held the Polish company could recover its advance payment due to a total failure of consideration. Facts In July 1939, the appellants, Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna (a Polish company), entered into a contract with the respondents, Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour, Ltd (an English company), for the purchase of certain machinery for £4,800. Delivery was to be to Gdynia, Poland. Per the contract terms, the appellants made an advance payment of £1,000. However, on 1 September 1939,
Facts The plaintiff, Mr Bolton, agreed to install a combined central heating and hot water system in the defendant’s, Mr Mahadeva’s, home for a lump sum price of £560. Upon completion, the defendant complained that the system was defective. The defects were significant: the system failed to heat the house adequately, with the heat output being substantially lower than it should have been, and it produced fumes in the living room, making it uncomfortable and unsafe. The cost to remedy these defects was assessed by the trial judge to be £174.50. The defendant refused to pay any portion of the