Unjust Enrichment CASES
In English law, unjust enrichment is a legal principle preventing individuals from retaining benefits or gains received unfairly or without a valid legal basis, requiring restitution.
Definition and Principles
Unjust enrichment occurs when one party unjustly benefits at the expense of another, without justification, typically prompting courts to order repayment or compensation.
Essential Elements
- Enrichment: One party has received a benefit or gain.
- At Another’s Expense: Another party has incurred a loss or disadvantage.
- Unjust Factor: No legal justification for retaining the enrichment.
Common Scenarios
- Payments made by mistake.
- Benefits obtained through undue influence or duress.
- Situations where contracts fail or are unenforceable.
Remedies
Courts usually order restitution, requiring enriched parties to return or compensate for the unfair benefit gained.
Practical Importance
Understanding unjust enrichment ensures fairness, encouraging accountability and preventing unjust financial advantages.
Home » Unjust Enrichment
Kleinwort Benson bank made payments to local authorities under interest rate swap contracts later held void in the Hazell case. The bank sought recovery of payments made under mistake of law. The House of Lords abolished the long-standing rule barring recovery of money paid under a mistake of law, establishing...
CTN Cash and Carry paid £17,000 to Gallaher for stolen cigarettes after Gallaher threatened to withdraw credit facilities. Gallaher genuinely but mistakenly believed payment was owed. The Court of Appeal held that lawful commercial pressure exercised in bona fide pursuit of a believed debt did not constitute economic duress enabling...