Blog

Lady justice next to law books

Birch v Birch [2017] UKSC 53

A divorced wife sought to postpone the sale of the matrimonial home, contrary to her undertaking to sell by 2012 if her husband was not released from mortgage covenants. The Supreme Court held the court had jurisdiction to release her from the undertaking and remitted the matter for determination on...

Lady justice with law books

McDonald v Newton or McDonald (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 52

Mr McDonald, a former miner, retired early on ill-health grounds shortly after marrying. On divorce, the question arose whether his pension's matrimonial property value should be apportioned by reference to his active contributing period or his total scheme membership. The Supreme Court held membership included non-contributing periods. Facts Mr McDonald...

Law books on a desk

R (on the application of Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure) & Ors) v Westminster City Council [2017] UKSC 50

Westminster City Council charged sex shop licence applicants fees including enforcement costs against unlicensed operators. Following CJEU's ruling that upfront refundable enforcement charges breached the Services Directive, the Supreme Court held the scheme was only partially invalid and the council could recover enforcement costs from successful licensees. Facts Westminster City...

Law books on a desk

PNM v Times Newspapers Ltd & Ors [2017] UKSC 49

A man arrested but never charged in connection with the Oxford child sex grooming investigation sought an injunction preventing newspapers from identifying him as a suspect referred to during the open criminal trial. The Supreme Court refused, upholding open justice and press freedom. Facts The appellant, Tariq Khuja (formerly anonymised...

Law books on a desk

Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors [2017] UKSC 48

Eli Lilly's patent covered pemetrexed disodium with vitamin B12 for cancer treatment. Actavis sought to market products using other pemetrexed salts and the free acid. The Supreme Court held these directly infringed under a reformulated doctrine of equivalents, marking a significant shift in UK patent law. Facts Eli Lilly held...

Law books in a law library

Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors [2017] UKSC 47

John Walker, a gay man, was denied confirmation that his civil partner (later husband) would receive the full spouse's pension on his death, because his service predated 5 December 2005. The Supreme Court held this restriction incompatible with the Framework Directive and disapplied it. Facts John Walker was employed by...

Law books on a desk

O’Brien v Ministry of Justice [2017] UKSC 46

Mr O'Brien, a retired part-time recorder, sought a judicial pension based on all 27 years of his service. The Supreme Court considered whether service before the Part-Time Work Directive's transposition deadline should count, and referred the question to the CJEU. Facts Mr Dermod O’Brien QC, a self-employed barrister, served as...

Lady justice with law books

R (on the applications of Kiarie and Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42

Two foreign criminals facing deportation challenged Home Secretary certificates under section 94B of the 2002 Act requiring them to bring their human rights appeals from abroad. The Supreme Court unanimously allowed their appeals and quashed the certificates, holding that out-of-country appeals would not be effective and breached article 8. Facts...

Lady justice next to law books

Christian Institute v Lord Advocate [2016] UKSC 51

The Supreme Court held that the named person provisions in Part 4 of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014, particularly the information-sharing measures, were outside the Scottish Parliament's legislative competence as they breached Article 8 ECHR rights to private and family life. Facts The Scottish Parliament enacted the...

Law books on a desk

Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Co & Ors [2010] EWHC 2026 (Comm) (04 August 2010)

Shipowners claimed wasted expenditure following charterers' repudiation of a five-year charterparty, despite earning more at higher market rates afterwards. The Commercial Court held reliance damages are governed by Robinson v Harman, so benefits from mitigation must be set off, leaving no recoverable loss. Facts The Charterers agreed to charter the...

Lady justice next to law books

LB Holdings Intermediate 2 Ltd, The Joint Administrators of v Lehman Brothers International (Europe), The Joint Administrators of & Ors [2017] UKSC 38

Following Lehman Brothers' 2008 collapse, the Supreme Court resolved multiple insolvency law questions arising from LBIE's surplus administration, including subordinated debt ranking, foreign currency conversion claims, post-administration interest, contributory liabilities in unlimited companies, and the extension of the contributory rule to administrations. Facts Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (LBIE), an unlimited...