Independent legal advice CASES
In English law, independent legal advice (ILA) refers to impartial advice provided by a solicitor or legal professional not associated with the other contracting party, ensuring informed consent and fairness in transactions.
Definition and Principles
ILA safeguards individuals entering significant agreements—such as guarantees, loans, settlements, or complex contracts—by confirming they fully understand implications, rights, and obligations without undue influence or pressure.
Situations Requiring ILA
- Guarantees or loans involving family members.
- Cohabitation agreements, divorce settlements and separation agreements.
- Agreements with significant financial or legal implications.
Legal Importance
ILA helps prevent disputes about enforceability by demonstrating genuine, informed consent, protecting vulnerable parties from claims of undue influence or coercion.
Practical Implications
Seeking independent legal advice ensures clarity, fairness, and legal certainty, particularly in transactions involving unequal bargaining power or significant personal obligations.
Home » Independent legal advice
In eight conjoined appeals, wives mortgaged their homes to secure husbands' business debts. The House of Lords clarified the doctrine of undue influence and set out practical steps a bank must take to ensure the wife's consent is properly obtained. Facts The case comprised eight conjoined appeals, each involving a similar factual pattern. A wife charged her interest in her home, often the matrimonial home held in joint names, as security for a loan or overdraft facility provided by a bank to her husband or a company through which he operated his business. The businesses later failed, and the bank
Two poor, ignorant men sold their reversionary interests for a significant undervalue without independent legal advice. The court set the sales aside as an unconscionable bargain, establishing that equity will protect poor and ignorant persons from such exploitative transactions. Facts The plaintiffs were two brothers, John Bennett Fry (a plumber’s assistant) and George Fry (a laundryman). Under a will, they were each entitled to a one-fifth share of a trust fund, contingent on them surviving their aunt, who was the life tenant. This type of future inheritance is known as a reversionary interest. In 1878, J. B. Fry sold his
Facts The plaintiffs, a family-owned company, Alec Lobb (Garages) Ltd, and its directors, Mr. and Mrs. Lobb, were in severe financial distress. To avoid insolvency, they entered into a complex transaction in 1969 with the defendant, Total Oil (GB) Ltd. The agreement consisted of a lease and lease-back arrangement for their garage premises. The plaintiffs leased the freehold of the property to Total for a term of 51 years in return for a premium of £35,000. Simultaneously, Total leased the property back to the company for a 21-year term. A crucial component of this arrangement was a ‘solus tie’ agreement,
