Equitable Remedies CASES

In English law, equitable remedies are judicial solutions granted at the court’s discretion to address situations where monetary compensation alone is insufficient or inappropriate.

Definition and Principles

Equitable remedies are discretionary measures provided by courts based on fairness and justice rather than strictly legal rights. They aim to correct unjust situations, preserve fairness, and enforce obligations where financial damages would not provide adequate relief.

Common Examples

  • Injunctions (orders to perform or cease certain actions).

  • Specific performance (ordering fulfilment of contractual duties).

  • Rescission (cancelling contracts due to misrepresentation).

Legal Implications

  • Awarded at the court’s discretion, considering fairness and conduct.

  • Not automatically granted; dependent on circumstances and adequacy of damages.

Practical Importance

Understanding equitable remedies enables parties to seek effective legal relief beyond mere monetary compensation, ensuring fair outcomes and justice in complex disputes.

Lady justice with law books

Thomas Bates & Son Ltd v Wyndham’s (Lingerie) Ltd [1980] EWCA Civ 3 (21 November 1980)

During lease renewal negotiations, a rent review clause was mistakenly omitted by the landlord. The tenant knew of the landlord's mistake but did not point it out. The court ordered rectification of the lease to include the rent review clause. Facts The plaintiffs (landlords) and the defendants (tenants) entered into negotiations for the renewal of a business tenancy for a term of 14 years. A previous arbitration between the parties had determined the rent for the existing lease. During negotiations for the new lease, both parties proceeded on the common understanding that the new lease would contain provisions for rent

Lady justice with law books

Lumley v Wagner [1852] EWHC Ch J96 (26 May 1852)

Opera singer Johanna Wagner contracted to sing exclusively for Lumley's theatre but then agreed to perform for a rival. The court granted an injunction preventing her from singing elsewhere, enforcing the negative stipulation, despite being unable to compel specific performance. Facts The claimant, Benjamin Lumley, was the lessee of Her Majesty’s Theatre. He entered into a contract with the defendant, Johanna Wagner, a celebrated opera singer, for her to perform exclusively at his theatre for a three-month period. A key term of the agreement was a negative stipulation, stating that Mdlle. Wagner would not use her talents at any other