Article 2 ECHR CASES
In human rights law, Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) protects the fundamental right to life. It obliges states not only to refrain from unlawful killing but also to actively safeguard life through preventive measures, rigorous investigations of deaths, and proper regulation of force by state authorities.
Definition and Principles
Article 2 imposes two key obligations on states: a negative obligation not to deprive individuals of life unlawfully, and positive obligations to protect individuals’ lives. Positive obligations include a duty to establish effective criminal laws, investigate suspicious deaths thoroughly, and protect those at foreseeable risk from harm (for example, individuals at risk of domestic violence or suicide). It also strictly regulates the circumstances in which state agents, such as police or military, can lawfully use lethal force—limiting it to cases where it is “absolutely necessary” to protect life or prevent serious harm.
Common Examples
Common cases under Article 2 involve deaths caused by police shootings, use of force during arrests or detention, military operations, deaths in custody, failures by authorities to prevent foreseeable violence (such as domestic abuse), and inadequate healthcare provision leading to avoidable death in custody or state care.
Legal Implications
States breaching Article 2 can face legal actions in domestic courts or at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Remedies may include declarations of violations, compensation to victims’ families, mandatory changes to state procedures (e.g., police training, healthcare reform), or reopening inadequate investigations. Article 2 claims frequently focus on whether a state’s investigative process meets standards of independence, thoroughness, and timeliness.
Practical Importance
Article 2 is essential for law students and researchers interested in human rights litigation, public law accountability, criminal justice, and the obligations of public bodies. Its rigorous standards shape state responsibility for protecting life and strongly influence domestic law and policy on policing, healthcare, detention, and public safety.
See also: Right to life; Positive obligations; European Convention on Human Rights; Human Rights Act 1998; ECtHR; State responsibility; Use of force; Deaths in custody; Investigative obligations.
Home » Article 2 ECHR
Giles Van Colle was murdered by a suspect he was due to testify against. The police knew of prior intimidation. His family sued the police. The House of Lords held there was no common law negligence liability but considered the police's positive obligations under Article 2 of the ECHR, clarifying the 'real and immediate risk' test. Facts Giles Van Colle was a key prosecution witness in a theft trial against his former employee, Daniel Brougham. In the months preceding the trial, Brougham engaged in a campaign of intimidation against Van Colle, including threatening phone calls and setting his car on