Pre-contractual Expenditure CASES

Lady justice with law books

Regalian Properties Plc v London Dockland Development Corpn 02 Nov 1994 [1995] 1 WLR 212, Ch D

A property developer incurred substantial costs during 'subject to contract' negotiations for a development project. When the other party withdrew, they sought restitution for these expenses. The court held that such pre-contractual costs are a normal commercial risk and not recoverable. Facts The London Dockland Development Corporation (LDDC), the defendant, invited tenders for a licence to develop a valuable site in Wapping. Regalian Properties Plc, the plaintiff, submitted a proposal and was selected as the preferred bidder. All subsequent negotiations for the final building agreement were conducted explicitly on a ‘subject to contract’ basis. During this period, and as a

Lady justice with law books

Anglia Television Ltd v Reed 29 Jul 1971 [1972] 1 QB 60, CA

Facts The plaintiffs, Anglia Television Ltd., planned to produce a television film and incurred significant expenses in preparation before securing a lead actor. These pre-production costs, totalling over £2,750, included fees for a director, a designer, a stage manager, and other critical staff. In August 1968, they contracted with the defendant, Robert Reed, a well-known American actor, to play the leading role. The contract was finalised on 30 August 1968. However, on 11 September 1968, the defendant’s agent repudiated the contract, informing the plaintiffs that Mr. Reed was already committed to another engagement in the United States and would not