October 5, 2025
White v Jones [1995] UKHL 5
A solicitor was instructed to create a new will benefiting the testator's daughters but negligently delayed until the testator's death. The daughters, who received nothing, sued the solicitor. The House of Lords held the solicitor owed a duty of care to the intended beneficiaries. Facts Mr Barratt, having previously disinherited his daughters (the plaintiffs) after a family dispute, reconciled with them. On 17 July 1986, he instructed his solicitors (the defendants) to draft a new will to include legacies of £9,000 for each daughter. The solicitor handling the matter negligently failed to act on these instructions with due expedition. Numerous