Compensatory Damages CASES
In English law, compensatory damages are monetary awards intended to place a claimant back into the position they would have occupied if the breach of contract or wrongful act had not occurred.
Definition and principles
Compensatory damages are awarded to directly address losses arising from breach of contract or tortious conduct. Their primary aim is restitution, ensuring the claimant is neither enriched nor impoverished but restored to their original financial state.
Types of compensatory damages
- Expectation damages: Cover the benefits or profits expected from contractual performance.
- Reliance damages: Reimburse expenses incurred by relying on the breached promise.
- Consequential damages: Address indirect losses resulting from the breach, provided they were foreseeable at contract formation.
Case example: Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd (1909)
In Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd, the House of Lords ruled that compensatory damages in contract do not extend to distress, humiliation, or injured feelings unless expressly provided for. The decision reinforced limits on compensation, focusing strictly on tangible financial losses.
Calculation and limitations
Damages must be foreseeable, clearly quantifiable, and directly linked to the breach. Courts typically avoid speculative claims and emotional distress damages unless explicitly agreed upon.
Criticism and practical considerations
Criticism arises regarding the strict exclusion of emotional or non-pecuniary losses in contract cases. Courts balance fairness with commercial certainty, cautiously managing compensatory awards.
Home » Compensatory Damages
Facts The plaintiff, Mr. Addis, was employed by the defendant, Gramophone Company Ltd., as their manager in Calcutta, India. His employment contract stipulated a salary of £15 per week and a commission on trade done. The contract was terminable upon six months’ notice. In October 1905, the company gave Mr. Addis the required six months’ notice of termination. However, they concurrently appointed his successor and took immediate steps to prevent him from performing his duties as manager. This action constituted a wrongful and abrupt dismissal, forcing Mr. Addis to return to England. At first instance, the jury awarded him £600