Supervening illegality CASES
In English contract law, supervening illegality arises where a contract that was lawful when formed later becomes illegal due to a change in the law.
Definition and principles
Supervening illegality occurs after contract formation and renders further performance unlawful. Unlike initial illegality, the parties are not at fault at the time the agreement is made.
The doctrine reflects the principle that the law will not require parties to perform obligations that have become illegal.
Effect on the contract
Where supervening illegality applies, the contract is typically discharged automatically. The parties are released from future obligations, but rights accrued before the illegality may still be enforceable.
Relationship with frustration
Supervening illegality is often treated as a category of frustration, as the change in law fundamentally alters the legal basis of performance and makes it impossible or unlawful to continue.
Practical importance
The doctrine provides certainty where legal change intervenes, protecting parties from liability for non-performance caused by developments beyond their control.
Home » Supervening illegality
A contract for reservoir construction was interrupted when the Minister of Munitions ordered work to cease during WWI and dispersed the plant. The House of Lords held the contract was frustrated as the prohibition fundamentally changed conditions, making resumed performance a substantially different contract from that originally agreed. Facts The...