intimidation CASES

Lady justice next to law books

Rookes v Barnard [1964] UKHL 1

Trade union officials threatened B.O.A.C. with strike action in breach of contract unless the employer dismissed a non-union employee. The House of Lords held this constituted the tort of intimidation, recognising that threats to breach contracts could form the basis of this tort, and that the Trade Disputes Act 1906 provided no immunity. Facts The appellant, Rookes, was employed by B.O.A.C. as a draughtsman and had resigned from the trade union A.E.S.D. The three respondents, officials of the union, threatened B.O.A.C. that unless Rookes was removed from the Design Office, all union members would withdraw their labour. This threatened strike

Law books on a desk

Berezovsky v Abramovich [2011] EWCA Civ 153 (23 February 2011)

Mr Berezovsky claimed he was intimidated by Mr Abramovich into selling his interests in Russian oil company Sibneft at an undervalue through threats linked to the Putin regime. He also claimed Mr Abramovich breached fiduciary duties regarding aluminium company Rusal. The Court of Appeal largely upheld permission to amend pleadings and rejected strike-out applications. Facts Mr Berezovsky, a Russian businessman and political exile, alleged he had disposable interests in two Russian companies: Sibneft (oil and gas) and Rusal (aluminium). He claimed that Mr Abramovich, who held legal title to shares in both companies, intimidated him into selling his Sibneft interest